Industry Insights: Q1 2026
Feb 2, 2026
A recent federal court decision involving the Caesars Entertainment 401(k) plan underscores the practical benefits a plan sponsor or other employer plan fiduciary obtain when they hire a third-party, 3(38), discretionary investment manager with day-to-day responsibility to select, monitor, and replace investments in the plan lineup.
In Wanek et al. v. Russell Investments Trust Company, plan participants brought fiduciary breach claims under ERISA against the employer plan fiduciary (a committee of plan sponsor employees), the plan sponsor, and the plan’s 3(38) discretionary investment manager that the committee had retained. In a decision on summary judgment, the court allowed claims against the investment manager to proceed, finding that there were factual questions about whether investment decisions were influenced by business interests rather than participant outcomes. However, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the plan sponsor and committee, citing documentation of a prudent process for appointing and monitoring the investment manager, including evidence of a robust RFP process to identify the investment manager and quarterly meetings to supervise the manager.
Why this matters for employer plan fiduciaries & advisors
The ruling reinforces that plan sponsors and other employer plan fiduciaries can mitigate liability when they:
For plan advisors, the ruling illustrates how offering 3(38) discretionary investment services can be a differentiator. It also demonstrates the importance of regular engagement with plan clients to help clients fulfill their supervisory responsibilities over the 3(38) investment manager.
In December 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed, as part of the INVEST Act, bipartisan legislation that would allow 403(b) retirement plans to have the same access to collective investment trusts (CITs), as virtually all other workplace retirement plans, including 401(k)s, governmental 457(b) plans, and the Federal Thrift Savings Plan. While the bill has advanced out of the House, it must still be passed by the Senate before becoming law.
Currently, 403(b) plans are disadvantaged by this lack of access. CITs are neck-in-neck with mutual funds as the most prevalent investment vehicle used by defined contribution plans and often offer meaningful cost savings compared to mutual funds. CIT access would expand the investment toolkit available to 403(b) plan decision makers and, when selected, can result in meaningful improvements in financial retirement security for participants. Even seemingly small cost savings, compounded over the course of a career, can result in a major improvement in retirement readiness and financial security.
Why this matters for 403(b) plan decision makers and advisors
If enacted, the legislation would:
Advisors that serve 403(b) plans should monitor legislative developments and may want to prepare now for CIT access by learning more about this investment vehicle.
Private market exposure in defined contribution plan investments and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations continue to be retirement industry hot topics. However, with increased focus in the media, politicization, evolving market practices, and regulatory discussion, it is important for advisors to understand that the underlying fiduciary standard governing these and all other ERISA plan investments has not changed/remains the same.
Under ERISA, fiduciaries must base investment decisions on financial risk and return considerations, acting solely in the best financial interest of plan participants and beneficiaries.
When considering investments with private market exposure—whether through private equity, private credit, or other non-publicly traded investments—advisors should evaluate their unique attributes (e.g., liquidity, valuation). But, ultimately, the fiduciary investment standard is unchanged: advisors should select an investment with or without private market exposure if reasonably determined to maximize risk adjusted financial returns. Likewise, ESG factors may be considered only when relevant for this determination. Fiduciaries cannot subordinate financial interests to policy, social, or non-financial objectives.
Why this matters for fiduciaries
Regardless of investment type, advisors and their plan sponsor and other employer plan fiduciary clients should ensure their governance processes, policies, and advisor conversations consistently adhere to ERISA’s long-standing fiduciary duties – and should remember that the fiduciary standard has not changed, even as product offerings evolve.
For assistance with your retirement needs, contact an IMA Retirement advisor
at retirement@imacorp.com or call 877.305.1864.
—
Investment advisory services provided by IMA Advisory Services, Inc. (IMAAS), doing business as IMA Retirement. IMAAS is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (CRD #112091). Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any level of skill or training. IMAAS is also a registered insurance agency. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. For more information please visit: https://adviserinfo.sec.gov and search for our firm name.
This material is provided for general and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal, tax, fiduciary or investment advice. If you are seeking legal, tax, or fiduciary advice, consult an appropriate professional. This information does not create a professional or fiduciary relationship with Great Gray Trust Company, RPAG, or any of its representatives.